Donald Trump [PHOTO CREDIT: ABC12]

A federal judge in Boston has ruled against the Trump administration’s decision to strip Harvard University of at least $2.6 billion in research funding, calling the move an “ideologically motivated assault” on higher education.

Judge Allison Burroughs, of the U.S. District Court in Boston, delivered the ruling on Wednesday, siding with Harvard in its lawsuit challenging the government’s action.

Judge Condemns “Smokescreen” Tactics

In her 84-page decision, Judge Burroughs said the administration’s justification — citing concerns over antisemitism — was a “smokescreen” to mask political retaliation against the Ivy League institution.

“We must fight against antisemitism, but we equally need to protect our rights, including our right to free speech,” Burroughs said. “Courts must safeguard academic freedom and ensure that important research is not improperly subjected to arbitrary and procedurally infirm grant terminations.”

The ruling marks a significant legal victory for Harvard, which argued that the cuts were an attack on academic freedom and a violation of constitutional rights.

Background of the Clash

Tensions between the Trump administration and elite universities have escalated in recent years, especially over race-conscious admissions policies, faculty hiring, and curriculum decisions.

Harvard rejected the administration’s April 11 demands for sweeping changes, including revisions to admissions and course content. That same day, officials moved to freeze $2.2 billion in research grants, later expanding the cuts to $2.6 billion.

While universities such as Columbia and Brown reached compromises with the administration, Harvard filed a lawsuit, accusing federal officials of launching a retaliatory campaign after it refused to comply.

Harvard’s Response

Harvard President Alan Garber welcomed the ruling, reiterating the institution’s stance that while antisemitism must be addressed, the government cannot dictate university policies on teaching, admissions, or research.

“No government should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study they can pursue,” Garber said.

What Comes Next

Although this ruling delivers Harvard a powerful advantage in its dispute with Washington, it may not be the final word. Former President Trump has previously vowed to appeal any unfavorable judgment.